The Essential Report Archive Read the latest report

  • Feb, 2015

    Voting for same sex marriage

    Q. If a political party or candidate supported same-sex marriage would you be more likely to vote for them, less likely to vote for them or does it make no difference to your vote?

     

    Total

     

    Vote Labor

    Vote Lib/Nat

    Vote Greens

    Vote Other

    More likely to vote for them

    26%

    32%

    13%

    67%

    25%

    Less likely to vote for them

    19%

    13%

    28%

    1%

    38%

    Makes no difference

    48%

    50%

    54%

    31%

    35%

    Don’t know

    6%

    5%

    5%

    1%

    2%

    26% say they would be more likely to vote for a candidate/party that supported same sex marriage, 19% say they would be less likely and 48% say it would make no difference to their vote.

    Those more likely include women (32%), aged 18-34 (42%) and university educated (34%).

    Those less likely include men (26%) and aged 65+ (31%).

  • Feb, 2015

    Same sex marriage laws

    Q. Regardless of your opinion about same-sex marriage, do you think it is likely or unlikely that the laws will be changed in the next few years to allow same-sex marriage? 

     

    Total

     

    Vote Labor

    Vote Lib/Nat

    Vote Greens

    Vote Other

    Total likely

    56%

    59%

    52%

    70%

    47%

    Total unlikely

    28%

    28%

    33%

    22%

    37%

    Very likely

    15%

    19%

    13%

    21%

    11%

    Likely

    41%

    40%

    39%

    49%

    36%

    Unlikely

    22%

    22%

    26%

    19%

    27%

    Very unlikely

    6%

    6%

    7%

    3%

    10%

    Don’t know

    16%

    13%

    14%

    8%

    16%

    56% think it is likely that the laws will be changed in the next few years to allow same-sex marriage and 28% think it is unlikely.

    There was little difference between across groups on this question.

  • Feb, 2015

    Opinion of retaining personal information

    Q. Which of the following statements is closest to your view?

     

    Total

     

    Vote Labor

    Vote Lib/Nat

    Vote Greens

    Vote Other

     

    Aug 2014

    Nov 2014

    Governments having access to personal telephone and internet information is necessary to protect society from terrorist or criminal actions.

    38%

    29%

    57%

    16%

    42%

    37%

    41%

    Governments are increasingly using the argument about terrorism to collect and store personal data and information, and this is a dangerous direction for society

    44%

    55%

    26%

    71%

    48%

    49%

    44%

    Don’t know

    18%

    15%

    16%

    13%

    10%

    13%

    15%

    Opinions were divided between the two statements. 38% agreed more that “Governments having access to personal telephone and internet information is necessary to protect society from terrorist or criminal actions” and 44% agreed more that “Governments are increasingly using the argument about terrorism to collect and store personal data and information, and this is a dangerous direction for society”

    Since this question was asked in November there has been a slight shift away from agreeing that “Governments having access to personal telephone and internet information is necessary to protect society from terrorist or criminal actions” – from 41% to 38%.

  • Feb, 2015

    Privatisation

    Q. Do you agree or disagree with the following statements about privatisation of Government-owned assets like electricity, water, rail, ports, etc?

     

    Total agree

    Total disagree

     

    Strongly agree

    Agree

    Disagree

    Strongly disagree

    Don’t know

    Selling off public utilities to private companies will help the economy

    25%

    53%

    4%

    21%

    28%

    25%

    22%

    Selling Government assets frees up money to reallocate to other services and infrastructure

    38%

    44%

    5%

    33%

    27%

    17%

    18%

    Privatisation mainly benefits the corporate sector

    70%

    13%

    29%

    41%

    10%

    3%

    17%

    Utilities like water and power suppliers are too important to be sold off

    72%

    13%

    40%

    32%

    10%

    3%

    14%

    Private companies can run public utilities more efficiently than Governments

    36%

    39%

    7%

    29%

    24%

    15%

    24%

    Privatisation means more competition which benefits consumers

    33%

    49%

    6%

    27%

    29%

    20%

    19%

    Private companies deliver better quality services than Government-run organisations

    33%

    46%

    6%

    27%

    29%

    17%

    22%

    Prices always increase more when services are privatised

    70%

    13%

    34%

    36%

    11%

    2%

    16%

    There was strongest agreement with the statements “Utilities like water and power suppliers are too important to be sold off” (72%), “Privatisation mainly benefits the corporate sector” (70%) and “Prices always increase more when services are privatised” (70%).

  • Feb, 2015

    Federal politics – voting intention

    Q. If a Federal Election was held today to which party will you probably give your first preference vote? If not sure, which party are you currently leaning toward?

    Q. If don’t know -Well which party are you currently leaning to?

     Sample size = 1,799 respondents

    First preference/leaning to

    Election

    7 Sep 13

     

    2 weeks ago 20/1/15

    Last week

    27/01/15

    This week 3/2/15

    Liberal

     

    36%

    36%

    35%

    National

    4%

    3%

    3%

    Total Liberal/National

    45.6%

    40%

    39%

    38%

    Labor

    33.4%

    40%

    41%

    41%

    Greens

    8.6%

    10%

    9%

    9%

    Palmer United Party

    5.5%

    2%

    2%

    3%

    Other/Independent

    6.9%

    9%

    9%

    9%

     

    2 Party Preferred

    Election

    7 Sep 13

     

    2 weeks ago 20/1/15

    Last week

    27/01/15

    This week 3/2/15

    Liberal National

    53.5%

    47%

    46%

    46%

    Labor

    46.5%

    53%

    54%

    54%

    NB. The data in the above tables comprise 2-week averages derived from the first preference/leaning to voting questions.  Respondents who select ‘don’t know’ are not included in the results.  The two-party preferred estimate is calculated by distributing the votes of the other parties according to their preferences at the 2013 election.

  • Feb, 2015

    Republic

    Q.  Are you in favour or against Australia becoming a republic?

     

    Total

     

     

    Vote Lab

    Vote Lib/
    Nat

    Vote Green

    Vote other

     

    Jan 2010

    Mar 2011

    Oct 2011

    Jun 2012

    Apr 2014

    Oct 2014

     

    Shift since Oct 2014

    In favour

    34%

    50%

    22%

    53%

    30%

    41%

    39%

    41%

    39%

    33%

    31%

    +3

    Against

    34%

    21%

    51%

    17%

    38%

    32%

    34%

    33%

    35%

    42%

    31%

    +3

    No opinion

    32%

    30%

    26%

    30%

    32%

    27%

    27%

    26%

    27%

    25%

    38%

    -6

    34% (up 3% since October) of respondents were in favour of Australian becoming a republic and 34% (up 3%) were against. 32% could not give an opinion.

    Greens (53%) and Labor (50%) voters were more likely to be in favour of a republic. Lib/Nat voters (22%) were less likely.

    Males (40%) were far more likely than females (29%) to be in favour of a republic.

  • Feb, 2015

    Knights and Dames

    Q. Do you approve or disapprove of the Government’s decision to re-introduce the honours of Knight and Dame of the Order of Australia?

     

     

    Total

     

     

    Vote Labor

    Vote Lib/Nat

    Vote Greens

    Vote other

     

    Apr 2014

    Total approve

    26%

    16%

    43%

    23%

    18%

    27%

    Total disapprove

    46%

    60%

    32%

    64%

    53%

    43%

    Strongly approve

    4%

    4%

    7%

    3%

    1%

    6%

    Approve

    22%

    12%

    36%

    20%

    17%

    21%

    Disapprove

    24%

    25%

    25%

    27%

    32%

    22%

    Strongly disapprove

    22%

    35%

    7%

    37%

    21%

    21%

    Don’t know

    28%

    23%

    26%

    13%

    29%

    30%

    46% (up 3% since April) disapprove of the Government’s decision to re-introduce the honours of Knight and Dame of the Order of Australia, 26%  (down 1%) approve and 28% don’t know.

    Strongest approval came from Liberal/National voters (43%).

    Strongest disapproval came from respondents aged 45+ (57%), Labor voters (60%) and Greens voters (64%).

  • Feb, 2015

    Knighthood for Prince Philip

    Q. Do you approve or disapprove of Australia awarding a knighthood to Prince Philip?

     

     

    Total

     

     

    Vote Labor

    Vote Lib/Nat

    Vote Greens

    Vote other

    Total approve

    14%

    10%

    24%

    14%

    8%

    Total disapprove

    69%

    79%

    59%

    79%

    76%

    Strongly approve

    4%

    4%

    6%

    4%

    2%

    Approve

    10%

    6%

    18%

    10%

    6%

    Disapprove

    31%

    25%

    39%

    25%

    32%

    Strongly disapprove

    38%

    54%

    20%

    54%

    44%

    Don’t know

    17%

    12%

    17%

    7%

    16%

    69% disapprove of Australia awarding a knighthood to Prince Philip and only 14% approve.

    Highest disapproval came from Labor voters (79%), Greens voters (79%) and those aged 45+ (80%).

Error: