The Essential Report Archive Read the latest report

  • Oct, 2013

    Compulsory voting

    Q. Australia is one of the few countries in the world where voting is compulsory at state and federal elections.

    Do you support or oppose compulsory voting in Australia?

     

    Total

     

    Vote Labor

    Vote Lib/Nat

    Vote Greens

    Total support

    71%

    79%

    74%

    71%

    Total oppose

    25%

    19%

    24%

    26%

    Strongly support

    38%

    47%

    40%

    30%

    Support

    33%

    32%

    34%

    41%

    Oppose

    15%

    13%

    17%

    15%

    Strongly oppose

    10%

    6%

    7%

    11%

    Don’t know

    4%

    2%

    2%

    3%

    71% support compulsory voting and 25% oppose.

    There was strong majority support from all demographic groups – especially over 65’s (94%), Labor voters (79%) and those with university educations (78%).

  • Oct, 2013

    , ,

    Senate – balance of power

    Q. Clive Palmer’s Palmer United Party now has the balance of power in the Senate.

    With this in mind, do you think the election of micro parties in the Senate – such as Palmer United Party, Family First, Liberal Democrats, Motor Enthusiasts Party, Australian Sports Party – is good or bad for democracy?

     

    Total

     

     

    Vote Labor

    Vote Lib/Nat

    Vote Greens

    Good for democracy

    36%

    41%

    28%

    35%

    Bad for democracy

    26%

    23%

    38%

    19%

    Makes no difference

    17%

    18%

    18%

    19%

    Don’t know

    20%

    19%

    16%

    27%

    36% think that the election of micro parties to the Senate is good for democracy and 26% think it is bad. 17% think it makes no difference. Labor voters are more likely to think it is good (41%) while Liberal/National voters are more likely to think it is bad (38%).

    44% of high income earners ($1,600+ pw) think it is good as do 45% of Queenslanders.

  • Oct, 2013

    , , , ,

    Same sex marriage

    Q. Do you think people of the same sex should or should not be allowed to marry?

     

    Total

    22 Oct 13

     

    Vote Labor

    Vote Lib/Nat

    Vote Greens

     

    15 Nov 10

    14 Mar 11

    4 Jul 11

    13 Aug 12

    24 Sep 12

    22 Apr 13

    6 May 13

    Should be allowed to marry

    57%

    65%

    41%

    80%

    53%

    49%

    54%

    54%

    55%

    54%

    58%

    Should not be allowed to marry

    31%

    23%

    45%

    10%

    36%

    40%

    35%

    33%

    36%

    33%

    32%

    Don’t know

    12%

    11%

    14%

    11%

    11%

    10%

    11%

    13%

    9%

    13%

    10%

    57% agree that people of the same sex should be allowed to marry and 31% think they should not. These results are very similar to the last time this issue was measured in May. However, over the last 3 years support for same sex marriage has increased a little and opposition declined.

    Support for same sex marriage is 49% among men but 65% among women. 66% of under 35’s and 62% of those with university education support same sex marriage.

  • Oct, 2013

    ,

    Federal politics – voting intention

    Q. If a Federal Election was held today to which party will you probably give your first preference vote? If not sure, which party are you currently leaning toward?

    Q. If don’t know -Well which party are you currently leaning to?

    Sample size = 1,887 respondents

    First preference/leaning to

    Election

    7 Sep 13

    (current  figures)

     

    4 weeks ago

    19/09/13

    2 weeks ago

    01/10/13

    Last week

    8/10/13

    This week

    15/10/13

    Liberal

     

    42%

    41%

    40%

    41%

    National

    2%

    3%

    3%

    2%

    Total Lib/Nat

    45.5%

    44%

    44%

    43%

    43%

    Labor

    33.4%

    37%

    35%

    35%

    35%

    Greens

    8.7%

    9%

    9%

    9%

    10%

    Other/Independent

    12.4%

    10%

    12%

    12%

    12%

     

    2 Party Preferred

    Election

    7 Sep 13

     

    4 weeks ago

    xx

    2 weeks ago

    xx

    Last week

    8/10/13

    This week

    15/10/13

    Liberal National

    53.4%

    51%

    53%

    52%

    52%

    Labor

    46.6%

    49%

    47%

    48%

    48%

    NB.  The data in the above tables comprise 2-week averages derived from the first preference/leaning to voting questions.  Respondents who select ‘don’t know’ are not included in the results.  The two-party preferred estimate is calculated by distributing the votes of the other parties according to their preferences at the 2010 election.

  • Oct, 2013

    , ,

    MP pay

    Q. A federal Member of Parliament who has no ministerial responsibility is paid about $195,000 per annum.

    Do you think this is:

     

    %

     

    Lib/Nat voters

    voters

    Labor voters

    Green voters

    Too high

    71%

    66%

    75%

    65%

    About right

    27%

    31%

    23%

    35%

    Too low

    2%

    3%

    2%

    71% of people believe that the pay of federal MP’s who have no ministerial responsibilities is too high. 27% think it is about right, and 2% think it is too low.

    Labor voters (75%) were more likely than Lib/Nat (66%) and Green (65%) voters to think it was too high.

    Females (76%) were more likely than males (65%) to think it was too high.

     

  • Oct, 2013

    Expenses

    Q. Which political expenses should taxpayers reimburse politicians for:

     

    Yes

    No

    Don’t Know

     

    Lib/Nat voters

    ‘Yes’

    Labor voters

    ‘Yes’

    Green voters

    ‘Yes’

    Overseas study trips (a limited number per year)

    36%

    49%

    15%

    41%

    33%

    34%

    Travel for events directly related to their electoral or parliamentary work (unlimited if work related)

    70%

    21%

    9%

    72%

    67%

    80%

    Printing of materials to inform their electorate

    53%

    36%

    11%

    59%

    51%

    60%

    Publications allowance (for books and magazines)

    31%

    55%

    14%

    35%

    30%

    45%

    Travel for politicians families to visit them in Canberra

    18%

    71%

    11%

    23%

    17%

    16%

    Travel for politicians spouses to accompany them on overseas trips

    15%

    74%

    11%

    21%

    13%

    6%

    Free use of a taxpayer funded car

    29%

    57%

    14%

    34%

    26%

    35%

    A $240 per night allowance for nights spent in Canberra, regardless of where the MP stays

    19%

    68%

    13%

    21%

    17%

    18%

    A $32,000 electorate allowance that covers the cost of serving the electorate, which MP’s can keep if it is not spent

    16%

    70%

    14%

    21%

    14%

    15%

    Social events for networking purposes

    19%

    64%

    16%

    27%

    15%

    7%

    The majority of people think that the following political expenses should not be reimbursed to politicians; ‘travel for politicians spouses to accompany them on overseas trips’ (74%), ‘travel for politicians families to visit them in Canberra’ (71%), ‘a $32,000 electorate allowance, which MP’s can keep if not spent’ (70%), ‘A $240 per night allowance for nights spent in Canberra, regardless of where MP’s stay’ (68%), ‘social events for networking purposes’ (64%),  ‘free use of taxpayer funded car’ (57%), ‘publications allowance’ (55%).

  • Oct, 2013

    ,

    Review of politicians entitlements

    Q. Attorney-General George Brandis has had to repay taxpayer reimbursements he had claimed for attending the wedding of a radio announcer.

    As the Attorney-General, George Brandis is responsible for a review of all politician entitlements.

    The Opposition is arguing that given his own actions, he is not fit to undertake that inquiry.

     

    %

     

    Lib/Nat voters

     voters

    Labor voters

    Green voters

    Attorney-General Brandis has re-paid the incorrect claim, and should be able to undertake the inquiry into politician entitlements

    26%

    41%

    16%

    8%

    Attorney-General Brandis is not fit to undertake the inquiry into politician entitlements

    48%

    33%

    61%

    69%

    Don’t know

    27%

    26%

    24%

    23%

    Almost half (48%) of people think that Attorney-General George Brandis is not fit to undertake the inquiry into politician entitlements.

    Just 26% think that as he has re-paid his incorrect claim, he should be able to undertake the inquiry.

    27% don’t know.

    Although Lib/Nat voters (41%) were more likely to think he should be able to undertake the inquiry (compared to just 16% of Labor voters and 8% of Greens voters), 33% still thought he is not fit to undertake the inquiry.

  • Oct, 2013

    Corruption – in industries

    Q. For each of the following Australian industries and organisations, please indicate how affected by corruption you think they are:

     

    Extremely corrupt

    Some corruption

    Not at all corrupt

    Don’t know

    Building and construction

    25%

    54%

    4%

    17%

    Finance sector (banks and insurance)

    18%

    52%

    13%

    18%

    Mining

    20%

    50%

    9%

    20%

    Agriculture

    7%

    36%

    30%

    27%

    Health

    11%

    43%

    25%

    20%

    Science and technology

    5%

    35%

    35%

    25%

    Media

    34%

    43%

    7%

    16%

    Education

    8%

    40%

    30%

    23%

    Law enforcement (police)

    18%

    58%

    9%

    14%

    Government

    32%

    51%

    4%

    14%

    From the industries and organisations listed, those that were most likely to be considered ‘extremely corrupt’ were the ‘Media’ (34%) and ‘Government’ (32%).

    The industries that were most likely to be considered ‘not at all corrupt’ were ‘Science and technology’ (35%), ‘agriculture’ (30%), ‘education’ (30%) and ‘health’ (25%).

    At least 40% of people considered each of the industries to be ‘extremely corrupt’, or have at least ‘some corruption’.

Error: