The Essential Report Archive Read the latest report

  • Oct, 2011

    , , , , , ,

    Jobs reform by Voting Intention

    Q. To what extent do you agree that the following measures will improve job creation and investment in Australia?

    Total Agree Total Agree – Labor Total Agree – Lib/Nat Total Agree- Greens
    Increasing the number of apprenticeships 88% 89% 91% 87%
    Giving incentives to companies that invest in research and development 79% 80% 83% 83%
    Boosting investment in renewable energy technologies 75% 80% 71% 88%
    Requiring companies to use Australian made steel in large infrastructure projects 73% 77% 77% 69%
    Implementing industrial relations changes that give more flexibility to business 57% 45% 75% 41%
    Bringing back tariffs on products imported from overseas 52% 52% 58% 40%
    Introducing industrial relations reforms to make it easier to hire and fire people 41% 26% 65% 18%

    Increasing the number of apprenticeships, giving incentives to companies that invest in research and development, and requiring companies to use Australia made steel in large infrastructure projects all receive a consistent level of endorsement across party lines.

    Labor voters are more likely to agree with boosting investment in renewable energy technologies (80% total agree) as a measure to improve job creation and investment in Australia, as are Greens voters (88% total agree).

    Labor voters are less likely to agree with implementing industrial relations changes that give more flexibility to business (45% total agree) and introducing industrial relations reforms to make it easier to hire and fire people (26% total agree).

    Coalition voters are the most likely to agree with the industrial relations reforms, with 75% agreeing with implementing industrial relations changes that give more flexibility to business and 65% agreeing with introducing industrial relations reforms to make it easier to hire and fire people.

    Comments »

  • Sep, 2011

    , , , , , , , ,

    Federal politics – voting intention

    Q. If a Federal Election was held today to which party will you probably give your first preference vote? If not sure, which party are you currently leaning toward?

    Q. If don’t know -Well which party are you currently leaning to?

    Sample size =  1891  respondents

    First preference/leaning to Election

    21 Aug 10

    4 weeks ago 2 weeks ago Last week This week
    Liberal 46% 46% 46% 46%
    National 3% 3% 3% 3%
    Total Lib/Nat 43.6% 49% 49% 49% 49%
    Labor 38.0% 32% 32% 32% 32%
    Greens 11.8% 10% 10% 10% 12%
    Other/Independent 6.6% 8% 10% 9% 8%
    2PP Election

    21 Aug 10

    4 weeks ago 2 weeks ago Last  week This week
    Total Lib/Nat 49.9% 56% 56% 56% 56%
    Labor 50.1% 44% 44% 44% 44%

    NB.  The data in the above tables comprise 2-week averages derived from the first preference/leaning to voting questions.  Respondents who select ‘don’t know’ are not included in the results.  The two-party preferred estimate is calculated by distributing the votes of the other parties according to their preferences at the 2010 election.

    Comments »

  • Sep, 2011

    , , ,

    Perceived intake of asylum seekers as a proportion of annual immigration

    Q.  From what you have read and heard, what percentage of Australia’s annual immigration intake are asylum seekers arriving by boat?

    7 Jun 2010 This week Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens
    50% or more 10% 12% 11% 13% 10%
    About 25% 15% 11% 10% 12% 6%
    About 10% 13% 10% 9% 10% 8%
    About 5% 15% 16% 18% 17% 16%
    1% or less 18% 25% 26% 24% 39%
    Don’t know 30% 27% 25% 23% 21%

    Twenty three per cent (23%) of respondents think that the proportion of asylum seeker intake by boat is 25% or more of the annual immigration intake.

    Ten per cent (10%) of respondents think that the percentage of boat arrivals is about 10% of annual immigration intake and 16% believe it to be about 5%.

    Twenty five per cent (25%) of respondents believe that the proportion of asylum seekers arriving by boat constitutes 1% or less of our annual immigration intake and 27% of respondents don’t know.

    Greens voters are the most likely to think that the percentage was 1% or less, with 39% of Greens respondents selecting this response.

    The proportion of respondents believing the proportion to be ‘1% or less’ has shifted 7 points up from 18% to 25% since 7 June 2010.

    Comments »

  • Sep, 2011

    , , , ,

    Best way of processing of asylum seekers

    Q. Thinking about the issue of asylum seekers arriving in Australia by boat, which of the following alternatives do you think is the best way to process those arriving:

    Total Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens 50% or more About 25% About 10% About 5% 1% or less
    Offshore, in any other country 11% 17% 11% 5% 17% 12% 10% 8% 9%
    Offshore, but only in a country where human rights are protected 31% 31% 37% 25% 27% 41% 36% 40% 30%
    Onshore (in Australia) 21% 24% 11% 58% 4% 7% 19% 27% 42%
    Turn the boats around 28% 21% 36% 6% 51% 39% 30% 23% 15%
    Don’t know 9% 8% 6% 6% 1% 1% 5% 3% 4%

    The most favoured method of processing asylum seekers was ‘offshore, but only in a country where human rights are protected’ (31%), followed by ‘turn the boats around’ (28%).

    Respondents then favour processing ‘onshore in Australia’ (21%) over processing asylum seekers ‘offshore in any other country’ (11%).

    Coalition voters are more likely to prefer processing asylum seekers offshore where human rights are protected (37%), as well as turning the boats around (36%).

    Greens voters are much more likely to prefer onshore processing in Australia (58%).  Labor voters are more likely to prefer processing offshore in any other country (17%) and somewhat more likely to prefer processing ‘onshore in Australia’ (24%).

    Respondents that believe the proportion of boat arrivals constitute ‘50% or more’ of the annual immigration intake are far more likely to favour ‘turning the boats around’ (51%).

    Conversely, respondents that believe the proportion to be ‘1% or less’ are far more likely to be in favour of processing onshore in Australia (42%).

    Comments »

  • Sep, 2011

    , , , , , ,

    Features of a good refugee processing system in Australia

    Q. Thinking about asylum seekers arriving in Australia, how important do you think each of the following features are for a good refugee processing system?

    Very important Important Not very important Not at all important Don’t know Total Important Total Not Important
    Stopping the boats 52% 22% 11% 8% 7% 74% 19%
    Keeping costs down 47% 34% 11% 2% 6% 81% 13%
    Protecting human rights 42% 38% 9% 5% 6% 80% 14%
    Avoiding prolonged detention 35% 33% 13% 12% 8% 68% 25%
    Making sure children have their claims processed in Australia 26% 32% 18% 13% 11% 58% 31%
    Allowing Australian courts to review claims 22% 34% 16% 16% 12% 56% 32%
    Approval from the United Nations 22% 32% 20% 16% 11% 54% 36%
    Making sure asylum seekers are not returned to the countries they have fled 20% 29% 18% 20% 13% 49% 38%

    Please note: ‘Total Important’ is an aggregate figure achieved by adding ‘Very Important’ and ‘Important’ together.  ‘Total Not Important’ is an aggregate figure that has been achieved by adding ‘Not very important’ and ‘Not at all important’ together.

    The most important feature of a ‘good refugee processing system’ is ‘keeping the costs down’, with 81% of respondents regarding this to be either very important or important, followed by ‘protecting human rights’ (80% total important).

    Seventy four per cent (74%) of respondents believed that ‘stopping the boats’ is an important feature and 68% regard ‘avoiding prolonged detention’ to be an important feature.

    Amongst the least important features of a good refugee processing system is ‘approval from the United Nations’, with only 54% regarding this to be important and 36% viewing it as not important.

    Making sure asylum seekers are not returned to the countries they have fled was the least important attribute, with only 49% believing it to be important and 38% regarding it as not important.

    Comments »

  • Sep, 2011

    , , , , ,

    Performance of Tony Abbott as Opposition Leader

    Q. Which of the following statements is closest to your view about the performance of Tony Abbott as Opposition leader?

    7 Mar 2011 6 Jun 2011 Total Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens
    Tony Abbott is performing the role of Opposition leader well and is keeping the Government accountable 41% 42% 38% 6% 77% 10%
    Tony Abbott is just opposing everything and is obstructing the work of the Government 43% 44% 45% 82% 11% 77%
    Don’t know 16% 15% 17% 12% 11% 13%

    The proportion of respondents that believe that Tony Abbott is performing the role of Opposition Leader well is 38%, down four points from when the question was last asked on 6 June 2011.  Coalition voters are far more likely to regard Abbott as performing the role well (77%).

    Forty five per cent (45%) of respondents believe that Abbott is just opposing everything and is obstructing the work of Government (45%), a result that is fairly consistent with the previous occasions on which the question has been polled.   Labor voters are the most likely to agree with this position (82%), as are Greens voters (77%).

    Respondents aged 65+ are much more likely to regard Abbott as performing well (56%).

    Respondents from Queensland were also somewhat more likely to regard Abbott as doing well (44%).

    Comments »

  • Sep, 2011

    , , , , , , , , ,

    Trust in various Australian institutions

    Q. How much trust do you have in the following institutions?

    Total Trust Total No Trust A lot of trust Some trust A little trust No trust Don’t know
    The High Court 72% 19% 33% 39% 13% 6% 10%
    The Reserve Bank 67% 24% 23% 44% 17% 7% 10%
    Courts in general 65% 26% 19% 46% 18% 8% 9%
    Charitable organisations 61% 30% 18% 43% 22% 8% 9%
    Federal Parliament 55% 36% 15% 40% 21% 15% 10%
    The ABC 46% 44% 12% 34% 31% 13% 10%
    Environment groups 45% 46% 11% 34% 28% 18% 9%
    Trade unions 39% 52% 10% 29% 30% 22% 10%
    Business groups 38% 51% 6% 32% 34% 17% 10%
    Religious organisations 29% 62% 9% 20% 27% 35% 9%
    Please note: ‘Total Trust’ is an aggregate figure achieved by adding ‘A lot of trust’ and ‘Some trust’ together.  ‘Total No Trust’ is an aggregate figure achieved by combining ‘A little trust’ and ‘No trust’.

    The institution in which respondents place the most trust is the High Court with 72% of respondents stating that they either have ‘a lot of trust’ or ‘some trust’ in the High Court.  The High Court is followed by the Reserve Bank (67%), Courts in general (65%) and Charitable organisations (61%).

    Federal parliament features below these top four, ranking 5th with 55% of respondents having either ‘a lot of trust’ or ‘some trust’, followed by the ABC which ranked in sixth place (46% total trust).

    The institutions for which respondents had the most distrust were trade unions (52% no trust), business groups (51% no trust) and Religious organisations, which attracted the highest proportion of distrust (62% no trust).

    Comments »

  • Sep, 2011

    , , , , , , ,

    Interest in upcoming Grand Finals

    Q. Which of the following upcoming sporting events are you most interested in?

    Total Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens
    The AFL Grand Final 32% 35% 33% 28%
    The NRL Grand Final 20% 19% 22% 17%
    The Rugby World Cup 10% 9% 12% 10%
    None of the above 38% 37% 34% 44%

    Whilst 38% of respondents had no interest in any of the upcoming football finals, 32% were most interested in the AFL, 20% in the NRL and only 10% in the Rugby World Cup.

    Female respondents are far more likely to state that they were not interested in any of the upcoming sport events (47%), as were respondents aged 18-24 yeas old (46%).

    Respondents from NSW are far more likely to have an interest in the Rugby World Cup (15%) and the NRL Grand Final (35%).

    Respondents from QLD are also far more likely to have an interest in the NRL Grand Final (32%).

    Victorian respondents are the most likely to be most interested in the AFL Grand Final (67%).

    Comments »

Error: