The Essential Report Archive Read the latest report

  • Jun, 2011

    , , , , , , ,

    Position on Live Cattle Exports

    Q. Which of the following statements is closest to your view?

    Total Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens
    Australia should not export live cattle to any country at all 22% 26% 18% 30%
    Australia should only export live cattle to countries which guarantee they will be treated humanely 58% 57% 59% 56%
    Australia should export live cattle to any country that wants them 14% 11% 19% 5%
    Don’t know 6% 5% 4% 8%

    58% believe that Australia should only export live cattle to countries which guarantee they will be treated humanely and 22% think Australia should not export live cattle to any country at all. Only 14% think Australia should export live cattle to any country that wants them.

    A majority of all voter and demographic groups think Australia should only export live cattle to countries which guarantee they will be treated humanely.

    Comments »

  • Jun, 2011

    , , , , , , ,

    Personal Effect of Mining Boom

    Q. Do you think the current mining boom in Australia has benefited you personally?

    Total Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens
    Yes 16% 18% 18% 19%
    No 69% 67% 69% 72%
    Don’t know 14% 15% 13% 9%

    Only 16% agree that they have personally benefited from the mining boom and 69% think they have not benefited.

    There was little difference across voter groups.

    Those on higher incomes are a little more likely to say they have benefited – 24% of those earning $1,600+ per week compared to 13% of those earning less than $1,000 per week.

    Comments »

  • Jun, 2011

    , , , , , , , ,

    Credibility of Scientists

    Q. Do you agree or disagree that the current public campaign against action on climate change in Australia is undermining the credibility of scientists and science research in general?

    Total Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens
    Total agree 32% 43% 26% 44%
    Total disagree 23% 14% 29% 31%
    Strongly agree 12% 15% 10% 22%
    Agree 20% 28% 16% 22%
    Neither agree nor disagree 30% 29% 33% 19%
    Disagree 15% 10% 18% 21%
    Strongly disagree 8% 4% 11% 10%
    Don’t know 15% 13% 12% 6%

    32% agree that the current public campaign against action on climate change in Australia is undermining the credibility of scientists and science research in general and 23% disagree. 45% either don’t know or neither agree nor disagree.

    Those most likely to agree were Labor voters (43%), Greens voters (44%) and those aged 18-34 (39%).

    Comments »

  • Jun, 2011

    , , , , , , , , ,

    Attitude to Scientific Evidence for Climate Change

    Q. Which of the following statements best reflects your attitude to doubts recently expressed by opponents of action on climate change about the science evidence?

    Total Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens
    Doubts are valid because nothing is certain in science 15% 14% 18% 9%
    Doubts are valid because man made climate change has not been proven 29% 15% 43% 11%
    Doubts are misleading because the science evidence of man made climate change is overwhelming 21% 33% 14% 36%
    Doubts are misleading because the science evidence has been rigorously tested and reviewed 11% 15% 7% 27%
    Don’t know 23% 24% 17% 17%

    Overall, 44% believe doubts about the science evidence for climate change are valid (mainly because man made climate change has not been proven) and 33% think doubts are misleading (mainly because the science evidence of man made climate change is overwhelming).

    Those most likely to think the doubts are valid were Liberal/National voters (61%), men (50%), aged 55+ (59%) and incomes under $600pw (54%).

    Those most likely to think doubts are misleading were Greens voters (63%), Labor voters (48%) and those on incomes over $1,600pw (41%).

    Comments »

  • Jun, 2011

    , ,

    New Campaign: Every Australian Counts

    The Every Australian Counts campaign is a unique, unified campaign.

    People living with disabilities, carers, families, service providers and advocates – have come together to create a movement for change.

    The campaign has one common goal. To make sure the federal government accepts the recommendations of the productivity commission and commits to introducing the National Disability Insurance Scheme.

    EMC was engaged to develop and deliver the digital campaign strategy, including the campaign website, www.everyaustraliancounts.com.au , campaign videos and materials.

    You can check out the presentation outlining the strategy to win, and the overall approach to the campaign below:

  • Jun, 2011

    , , , ,

    Importance of Asylum Seeker Issue

    Q. Is the issue of how Australia handles asylum seekers more or less important than issues such as managing the economy, education and health services? (This question has been commissioned by Network Ten)

    Total Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens Men Women Age

    18-34

    Aged

    35-54

    Aged 55+
    Total more or equally important 50% 49% 53% 56% 48% 52% 48% 50% 55%
    A lot more important 5% 6% 6% 6% 3% 7% 5% 4% 8%
    A little more important 5% 6% 5% 3% 6% 3% 5% 5% 5%
    Equally important 40% 37% 42% 47% 39% 42% 38% 41% 42%
    A little less important 21% 22% 21% 22% 18% 24% 25% 19% 20%
    A lot less important 23% 23% 25% 19% 28% 18% 20% 26% 23%
    Don’t know 5% 6% 1% 4% 4% 6% 8% 6% 2%

    50% think that the issue of how Australia handles asylum seekers is more/equally important as issues such as managing the economy, education and health services – 44% think it is less important.

    There were not substantial differences across voter and other groups – although Greens voters (56%) and those aged 55+ (55%) were a little more likely to think it was important.

    Comments »

  • Jun, 2011

    , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Federal politics – voting intention

    Q. If a Federal Election was held today to which party will you probably give your first preference vote? If not sure, which party are you currently leaning toward?

    Q. If don’t know -Well which party are you currently leaning to?

    sample size = 1,921

    First preference/leaning to Election

    21 Aug 10

    4 weeks ago 2 weeks ago Last week This week
    Liberal 43% 44% 44% 44%
    National 3% 3% 2% 3%
    Total Lib/Nat 43.6 46% 47% 46% 46%
    Labor 38.0 36% 34% 34% 34%
    Greens 11.8 11% 12% 12% 12%
    Other/Independent 6.6 7% 8% 8% 8%
    2PP Election

    21 Aug 10

    4 weeks ago 2 weeks ago Last week This week
    Total Lib/Nat 49.9% 52% 54% 53% 54%
    Labor 50.1% 48% 46% 47% 46%

    NB.  The data in the above tables comprise 2-week averages derived the first preference/leaning to voting questions.  Respondents who select ‘don’t know’ are not included in the results.  The two-party preferred estimate is calculated by distributing the votes of the other parties according to their preferences at the 2010 election.

    Comments »

  • Jun, 2011

    , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Approval of Julia Gillard

    Q. Do you approve or disapprove of the job Julia Gillard is doing as Prime Minister?

    Kevin Rudd Julia Gillard
    31 May

    2010

    19 Jul 20 Sep 20 Dec 17 Jan 2011 14 Feb 14 Mar 11 Apr 9 May 14 June
    Total approve 41% 52% 45% 43% 51% 48% 41% 37% 41% 34%
    Total disapprove 47% 30% 37% 40% 36% 41% 46% 50% 48% 54%
    Strongly approve 7% 11% 12% 10% 8% 9% 7% 7% 7% 6%
    Approve 34% 41% 33% 33% 43% 39% 34% 30% 34% 28%
    Disapprove 25% 17% 21% 24% 24% 25% 22% 25% 26% 29%
    Strongly disapprove 22% 13% 16% 16% 12% 16% 24% 25% 22% 25%
    Don’t know 12% 18% 19% 17% 14% 11% 13% 13% 11% 13%

    34% (down 7%) approve of the job Julia Gillard is doing as Prime Minister and 54% (up 6%) disapprove – a change in net rating from -7 to -20 over the last 5 weeks.

    76% of Labor voters approve (down 10%) and 14% disapprove (up 4%).

    By gender – men 34% approve/57% disapprove, women 35% approve/49% disapprove.

    Comments »

Error: