The Essential Report Archive Read the latest report

  • Mar, 2012

    , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Income Level to be Well Off

    Q. What annual income level would you say was the minimum to be “well off” for a single person?

    What annual income level would you say was the minimum to be “well off” for a family of 2 parents and 2 children?

    Single Person

    Family

     

    Total

    Income under $1,000pw

    Income $1,000 – $1,600pw

    Income $1,600+

    Total

    Income under $1,000pw

    Income $1,000 – $1,600pw

    Income $1,600+

    $40,000

    9%

    15%

    7%

    5%

    1%

    2%

    *

    1%

    $60,000

    26%

    28%

    31%

    23%

    6%

    13%

    5%

    2%

    $80,000

    28%

    25%

    27%

    33%

    15%

    21%

    17%

    10%

    $100,000

    19%

    15%

    20%

    24%

    17%

    19%

    19%

    15%

    $120,000

    7%

    5%

    6%

    9%

    16%

    12%

    19%

    17%

    $150,000

    3%

    3%

    3%

    5%

    21%

    16%

    18%

    29%

    $200,000

    1%

    *

    1%

    1%

    12%

    5%

    14%

    18%

    $300,000

    1%

    2%

    *

    1%

    3%

    3%

    2%

    5%

    $500,000

    *

    *

    1%

    2%

    3%

    1%

    1%

    $1 million

    1%

    1%

    1%

    1%

    1%

    1%

    1%

    Don’t know

    5%

    6%

    4%

    1%

    5%

    5%

    4%

    1%

    median

    $69,000

    $63,000

    $67,000

    $73,000

    $111,000

    $93,000

    $107,000

    $123,000

    63% think that a single person earning $80,000 would be considered “well off”. The average (median) minimum income for a single person to be considered “well off” was $69,000.

    55% think that a family earning $120,000 would be considered “well off”. The average (median) minimum income for a family to be considered “well off” was $111,000.

    Comments »

  • Feb, 2011

    , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Muslim Migrants

    Q. In your view, should the Australian government exclude Muslims from our migrant intake?
    (Question commissioned by Network Ten)

    Total Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens Men Women Aged 18-34 Aged 35-44 Aged 55+
    Yes 25% 21% 33% 8% 26% 25% 19% 26% 31%
    No 55% 62% 49% 83% 55% 54% 56% 57% 49%
    Don’t know/Refused 20% 17% 18% 8% 19% 21% 25% 17% 20%

    25% of respondents believed that the Australian government should exclude Muslims from our migrant intake and 55% disagreed. Those most likely to think Muslims should be excluded from our migration intake were Liberal/National voters (33%) and people aged 55+ (31%).

    Download the Network Ten Essential Question of the Week (1.1 MB pdf)

    Comments »

  • Feb, 2011

    , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Contribution of Multiculturalism

    Q. Overall, has multiculturalism (that is, the acceptance of people from different countries, cultures and religions) made a positive or negative contribution to Australian society?

    Total Vote Labor Vote Lib/Nat Vote Greens
    Total positive 57% 65% 54% 75%
    Total negative 29% 24% 36% 12%
    Very positive 15% 20% 10% 34%
    Positive 42% 45% 44% 41%
    Negative 18% 16% 21% 9%
    Very negative 11% 8% 15% 9%
    Made no difference 6% 6% 5% 3%
    Don’t know 8% 4% 4% 4%

    57% believe that multiculturalism has made a positive contribution to Australian society and 29% believe the contribution has been negative. A majority of all party voter groups believe the contribution has been positive.

    Older respondents tend to have a more negative view – those aged 55+ were split 48% positive/45% negative while those aged under 35 were 65% positive and 18% negative.

    Comments »

Error: